combine service/users data w/ mod unit
split sliding sync related out of service/users
instrument database entry points
remove increment crap from database interface
de-wrap all database get() calls
de-wrap all database insert() calls
de-wrap all database remove() calls
refactor database interface for async streaming
add query key serializer for database
implement Debug for result handle
add query deserializer for database
add deserialization trait for option handle
start a stream utils suite
de-wrap/asyncify/type-query count_one_time_keys()
de-wrap/asyncify users count
add admin query users command suite
de-wrap/asyncify users exists
de-wrap/partially asyncify user filter related
asyncify/de-wrap users device/keys related
asyncify/de-wrap user auth/misc related
asyncify/de-wrap users blurhash
asyncify/de-wrap account_data get; merge Data into Service
partial asyncify/de-wrap uiaa; merge Data into Service
partially asyncify/de-wrap transaction_ids get; merge Data into Service
partially asyncify/de-wrap key_backups; merge Data into Service
asyncify/de-wrap pusher service getters; merge Data into Service
asyncify/de-wrap rooms alias getters/some iterators
asyncify/de-wrap rooms directory getters/iterator
partially asyncify/de-wrap rooms lazy-loading
partially asyncify/de-wrap rooms metadata
asyncify/dewrap rooms outlier
asyncify/dewrap rooms pdu_metadata
dewrap/partially asyncify rooms read receipt
de-wrap rooms search service
de-wrap/partially asyncify rooms user service
partial de-wrap rooms state_compressor
de-wrap rooms state_cache
de-wrap room state et al
de-wrap rooms timeline service
additional users device/keys related
de-wrap/asyncify sender
asyncify services
refactor database to TryFuture/TryStream
refactor services for TryFuture/TryStream
asyncify api handlers
additional asyncification for admin module
abstract stream related; support reverse streams
additional stream conversions
asyncify state-res related
Signed-off-by: Jason Volk <jason@zemos.net>
this `real_users_cache` cache seems weird, and i have no idea what
prompted its creation upstream. perhaps they did this because
sqlite was very slow and their rocksdb setup is very poor, so
a "solution" was to stick member counts in memory.
slow iterators, scanning, etc do not apply to conduwuit where
our rocksdb is extremely tuned, and i seriously doubt something
like this would have any real world net-positive performance impact.
also for some reason, there is suspicious logic where we
overwrite the entire push target collection.
both of these things could be a potential cause for receiving
notifications in rooms we've left.
Signed-off-by: strawberry <strawberry@puppygock.gay>
