The previous code would drop some events entirely if any events between
`skip` and `skip + limit` were not visible to the user. This would cause
the set of events skipped by the `skip(skip)` method to extend past
`skip` in the raw result set, because `skip(skip)` was being called
*after* filtering out invisible events.
This bug will become much more severe with a full filtering
implementation, because it will be more likely for events to be filtered
out. Currently, it is only possible to trigger with rooms that have
history visibility set to "invited" or "joined".
Signed-off-by: strawberry <strawberry@puppygock.gay>
The previous code would fail to return next_batch if any of the events
in the window were not visible to the user. It would also return an
unnecessary next_batch when no more results are available if the total
number of results is exactly `skip + limit`.
This bug will become much more severe with a full filtering
implementation, because we will be more likely to trigger it by
filtering out events in a search call. Currently, it is only possible to
trigger with rooms that have history visibility set to "invited" or
"joined".
Signed-off-by: strawberry <strawberry@puppygock.gay>
